In the past several years, few books have amazed me as much as Daniel
Gardner’s The Science of Fear. Using scientific studies Gardner examines
in detail how fear works in the human psyche and then gets misapplied in
our lives.
His first best example is fear of flying after
9/11. Americans avoided flying in the year after the terrorists attacks, driving
rather than flying whenever they could. Yet, flying is far safer than driving.
A study compared flying and driving statistics and found increased traffic
deaths in 2002. It estimated that 1,595 people needlessly died on America’s
roads because they drove rather than flew in the year after 9/11.
Why do we make such bad choices about danger?
When an airliner crashes, our gut reacts and the
event is seared in our memory. But when traffic deaths mount in a slow dribble
– 1 at the edge of town, 3 a hundred miles away, and so on, we hardly notice.
Yet, at the end of the year, for every 10,000 people who flew vs. those who
drove, more will die in their cars than in a plane crash.
How about silicon breast implants? They can leak
and make women sick, right? We all know it's true. Yet, Gardner goes
looking for proof and finds not one single medical study has been able to
prove it. Never mind. There were endless emotional news stories of women, with tears in their eyes and agony in their
faces relating how a ruptured implant led to connective tissue disorder. It
must be true, right? Lawyers saw an opportunity and filed lawsuits. As
newspaper, television and magazine stories of ruptured implants mounted, public perception was universal; they’re dangerous! Manufacturers were
forced to establish a $4.25 billion fund to settle suits ($1billion went to
attorneys).
Gardner’s conclusion: “Humans are good with stories
and bad with numbers.”
What numbers got lost in all the emotional stories
of suffering women? The rate of connective tissue disorder in women who’ve
never had implants is exactly the same as it is in those who did. That’s why
the FDA has once again approved silicon implants.
Gardner explains how dramatic, emotional media
stories create a recognizable narrative. When future stories create the
impression of a trend, they’re reported no matter how meaningless the related
story might be, giving us an impression of a trend much bigger than it is.
After Timothy McVey blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, the media
dramatically increased their coverage of militia groups filled with angry white
men with guns, no matter how unimportant the story or minimal the threat. It
was part of the ongoing narrative. 9/11 broke that narrative and replaced angry
white men with militant Muslims. Now actual terrorism committed by angry white
men gets far less media attention than simple charges or suspicions of Muslim
extremists.
According to a report in Newsweek Magazine in
February of this year, American right wing militia groups have killed more people since
2002 than Muslim extremists. But it seems no one is aware. Donald Trump isn't insisting that white militia members be profiled for examination by authorities, he's calling for profiling Muslims.
It get's crazier. When I do searches of gun deaths caused by toddlers with guns (toddlers who found a loaded gun in their home and shot someone) I find that toddlers killed and maimed more Americans in the past year than terrorists did. Shall we start profiling toddlers?
It get's crazier. When I do searches of gun deaths caused by toddlers with guns (toddlers who found a loaded gun in their home and shot someone) I find that toddlers killed and maimed more Americans in the past year than terrorists did. Shall we start profiling toddlers?
Needless fear also gets stoked when danger is
presented without context. Fears of both
child abduction and West Nile virus are great examples of dangers presented
without context.
In 1999 West Nile virus became an exotic new
threat. Media outlets tallied daily death counts. Public fear spread. Yet,
only 1 in 150 people who contract West Nile actually suffer serious symptoms,
and far, far fewer die. Still, TV anchors breathlessly told us, “West Nile
claimed it’s 18th victim today.”
And 18 was the grand total of deaths from the virus
in all of 2002. They didn’t offer any context, such as 875 Americans die in a
typical year choking on food – that’s over 48 times the threat of West Nile.
Where’s our daily choking report?
Still, a 2002 Pew survey found that 70% of American
were closely following the West Nile story even though the chances of getting
it were tiny, chances of suffering symptoms were rarer still, and the chances
of dying from it were statistically miniscule. Only 7% more (77%) followed the
build-up to war with Iraq.
Fear sells.
In 2012, we panicked all over again, but this time
it was Ebola. That turned out to be yet another screaming headline without much of a story. Only time will tell if Zika will be a real threat, or another pointless panic.
Few things scare a parent more than the threat of
child abduction. We have Amber alerts, Anderson Cooper specials about bizarre
abductions, we fingerprint children and train them in self-defense. Yet, the
odds of a child being abducted by a stranger and never returned are freakishly
rare.
Gardner documents routine claims by law enforcement
officials, child advocacy groups, and the media claiming “50,000- 75,000
children are stolen from their parent’s arms each year.” He goes looking for
the original source of these numbers and can’t find it. The phantom numbers
were caught in a feedback loop. One group used them, another group sited the
first group’s use of the numbers, and on and on until newspapers and TV anchors
are reporting, “Child advocacy groups claim that 50,000-75,000 . . .”
Gardner instead found a 1999 study that finally
laid out the actual numbers. That year 797,500 people under the age of 18 were
reported missing. If you take that number, subtract the runaways and the family
abductions (one parent or other family member taking a child in a custody
dispute), and then subtract the 18 year old boyfriends who drove their 16 year
old girlfriends across state lines, and concentrate on just stereotypical
kidnappings of children under the age of 14, you’re left with only 90 cases.
Not 50,000 nor 75,000, but 90!
But then the personal stories of those 90
kidnappings get reported over and over along with the unfounded numbers,
“50,000-70,000” thrown in for effect. Without the context we’re left thinking
our children are in terrible, relentless danger. What are the real odds your
child will be kidnapped? One in 608,696. But an American child is 2.5 times
more likely to drown in a swimming pool and 26 times more likely to die in a
car crash.
So why is there so much fear and why do we spend so much
energy fearing the wrong things while ignoring real dangers? Gardner states it
pretty well; “We are safer and healthier than ever and yet we are more
worried about injury, disease, and death than ever. Why? In part, it’s because
there are few opportunities to make money from convincing people they are, in
fact, safer and healthier than ever – but there are huge profits to be made
promoting fear.”
“A broken man, an abandoned house, and a lonely woman—all the makings for a beautiful, haunting tale of loss, forgiveness, and redemption. The Salvage Man is a lovely, bitter sweet story you won’t soon forget. I loved it!”
Sherri Wood Emmons, author of The Seventh Mother
“Meyer turns the pages of history with gentle care and a warm heart, creating a story I’ll remember forever. Thank you Kurt Meyer for opening a door to my beloved town’s past and allowing me to travel the streets and meet the people of Noblesville 1893.”
Susan Crandall, Author of Whistling Past the Graveyard
Had to laugh as this is so true. Fear sells, and it's all about ratings. We must be smarter than the media we read.
ReplyDelete